My beef about this is, that if the Middle East and in particular Muslims want all you claim they want (democracy? or is that just a stepping stone so some clerics can be voted into power for a new theocracy?) how about they bring it about? Especially pay for it. I do not really mind if they use money, time, lives or their ‘pride’ for that.
If Saddam was the best Iraq could come up with as a secular government, then be it. And if civil war is a past time in Algeria, up to the Algerians. If the Mid East likes its local religious floklore (car bombs, veiled women, terrorism) then let them have fun with it all over the mid East and up to Morocco if they want to. And keep it in mind when their so called “poor and downtrodden” want to emmigrate.
Your avatar fits Fred. Same whiney “we got too help these poooooor brown people, boo-hoo-hoo” sob as from Fischer’s Greens. You joined his party already?
The latter is about as much help as the Muslims world deserves in my eyes. Last I heard French police was dealing with Arab youths in the suburbs of Paris. And that’s about as much “help” as I am willing to support for the Muslim world. Help those out of the West who have too many problems fitting in there. They may fit in a lot better at home maybe, where they may mess up their own countires as much as they like to.
Yup - every heart-bleeding do-gooder. Count me out though if you can and pick some other word for “everybody” because I frankly could not care less how exactly people like to kill each other in Sudan.
I heard a similar whiney rant about the poooooor Somalians from the Greens for years and it sounded lame all the time. Petty distractions from a lack of substance. At the end of the day, is there also something in for the West in your “strategic payoff”?
Anyone else on a “Heal the World” trip besides Michael Jackson and Fred Smith? How about you TainanCowboy? What’s your take on this issue?