[quote]Productivity Problems Of Unionized Firms
Companies and industries in which unions have significant power have been steadily declining, and union power has been declining along with them. Less than 10 percent of the private work force is unionized now – compared to about 27 percent in the early 1950s.
Since unionized workers earn about 15 percent more on average than nonunionized workers, these higher wage costs put unionized businesses at a competitive disadvantage – which, according to studies, they are generally unable to overcome.
A forthcoming analysis by Kevin Hassett, of the American Enterprise Institute, and Federal Reserve economist Bruce C. Fallick identifies several strategies unionized businesses could pursue to overcome the disadvantage of higher wage costs. But it concludes that the strategies are not really effective.
* Theoretically, a unionized company could buy more machines and automate its way to lower production costs.
* But unionized companies seldom take this route – because as the company’s profits increase, unions simply escalate their wage demands.
work less…demand more?..Feck off.
* Unionized companies have been accused of acquiring nonunionized firms to get around higher wages and union work rules.
* But unionized companies almost always merge with other unionized companies out of fear that unions will spread to a nonunionized acquisition -- thereby [b]prompting a decline in the value of the formerly nonunionized asset. [/b]
Proof that unionized businesses usually reject the automation strategy is provided by the fact that firms generally invest about 30 percent less in new machines when their workers are unionized.
Studies show that American workers in recent years have become increasingly less convinced that unions are worthwhile.
Source: Kevin Hassett (American Enterprise Institute), “Why Big Labor Keeps Getting Smaller,” Wall Street Journal, August 3, 1998. [/quote]
The Idiocy of Unions.
[quote]Union blames big business sending jobs overseas
THE service sector is at risk of losing more than one million jobs during the next two decades as a result of big business outsourcing work overseas, a union report predicts.
One in 10 service jobs could be sent offshore, the report prepared for the Service Unions of Australia reveals today.
[/quote]
news.com.au/business/story/0 … 62,00.html
Geeeeeeez…wonder how that happened? UNIONS? Now the “Unions” Shit bricks?
Piss people off enough by “demanding” that Foreign teachers “deserve” more than their local equally qualified counterparts…?
You’re kidding riiiiight?
The newbie and his poorly informed compadres are in for a rude awakening. There are too damned many FOB’s scrambling for ARC’s. <— THAT is the magic bullet.
Do you have any CLUE why soooo many “teachers” are sweating bullets just to GET an ARC? Then you want to throw in TRIPE about “Rights to More Inflated Wages”…delusional thinking.
There are a million and one ways for an owner to legally get rid of you. Don’t forget that nasty little FACT. There is no reason on earth to extend a contract after it expires either.
FIRST: Make damn good and sure you are even worth HALF of what you are being paid.
2nd: Make sure you have the “correct” accent. …LOL
3rd: Quit yer bitching.
Present day “Unions” are nothing but a huge drain on everybody…and the most amusing thing…They KILLED their own jobs! waaaaaaaaahhhhhh…but no worries…people Over seas are profiting from their stupidity.
You’ve already collectively admitted you lack the ability to negotiate better contracts for yourselves…so you bumble along on a misguided attempt to “lead” newbies to a nirvana of contractual demands? Idiotic!
There are plenty of very decent FOB’s…and even more tried and experienced teachers to choose from. You want to “edumacate” newbs with BS?
Puff them up with crap and send them into an interview and they BLOW it when it comes time to discuss the contract? You REALLY ought to give your head a shake.
There is REALITY and there is BUSINESS. Neither of which you have the vaguest grasp of.