[The passage which @tando quoted, immediately above, is located here, in a very large document in PDF format; clicking the link in the word “here” will cause a window to pop up for downloading that PDF document from the site of the National Development Council.]
Thanks for that one, @tando. If I’m reading this correctly, it means that there are other people who find the law confusing. The employer assumed it was adequate to put the head office in Taipei as the workplace, even though the worker was going to work in a factory located in Guanyin District in Taoyuan, which appears to be about 43 kilometers away. This would supposedly cause problems when applying for a work permit.
Edited to add:
@GreatInternetMaster, I see that @yyy posted about the issue 32 minutes ago in another part of the board:
Thank you, @yyy, and thanks again, @tando!
Edited to add again; here’s an interesting post in the thread about working remote: