One doesn’t need be a medical expert. Actual medical experts, genuine scientists uncompromised by Big Pharma and govt nudge units, have done that work. The datasets are freely available. Such studies have been supplied, here and in other threads.
I would add, if one have no ability at all to discern fact from fiction, to tell (especially at this stage) that there was clearly a dodgy-science profit-motive behind the vaccine programmes, that what was claimed regarding vaccine safety and efficacy was patently false, then what to do? Happily, one can thereby live in ignorance. The only course for such an individual appears to be complete dependence on pseudo-medical authorities, Big Pharma, and the gubmint, 24/7, for all one’s “expert” health advice.
“Based on public data provided by the CDC, we estimate that approximately 22,000 to 30,000 previous uninfected young adults ages 18–29 years must be boosted with an mRNA vaccine to prevent one Covid-19 hospitalisation. Given the fact that this estimate does not take into account the protection conferred by prior infection nor a risk-adjustment for comorbidity status, this should be considered a conservative and optimistic assessment of benefit. Our estimate hows that university Covid-19 vaccine mandates are likely to cause net expected harms to young healthy adults—between 18 and 98 serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation and 1373 to 3234 disruptions of daily activities—that is not outweighed by a proportionate public health benefit. Serious Covid-19 vaccine-associated harms are not adequately compensated for by current US vaccine injury systems. As such, these severe infringements of individual liberty are ethically unjustifiable.”
Florida Department of Health; Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital
These are not just “some randos off the internet.” For example, Salmaan Keshavjee, MD, PhD, ScM, is the Director of Harvard Medical School’s Center for Global Health Delivery and Professor of Global Health and Social Medicine in the Department of Global Health and Social Medicine (DGHSM) at Harvard Medical School. He is also Associate Professor of Medicine in the Division of Global Health Equity at Brigham and Women’s Hospital.
Dr. Stefan Baral (MD, MPH, FRCPC, CCFP) is an Affiliate Scientist with the Knowledge Translation Program and a physician epidemiologist and Professor in the Department of Epidemiology at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. Stefan completed his certification in Community Medicine as a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada and Family medicine with the Canadian Council of Family Physicians.
Frankly, I think this is a milestone in the collapse of British democracy. Whatever anyone might think about Bridgen or his use of hyperbole (there have been plenty of massacres since The Holocaust), he was removed on completely spurious grounds. He said nothing about Jews, and his criticism of that the vaccine debacle was that it was the worst cull “since the Holocaust”. He did not suggest that it was like the Holocaust; he was using that event (perhaps incorrectly) merely as a landmark in human cruelty.
He either has a point or he does not. If he was wrong, then Midazolam Matt and W.E.F. Sunak could have explained why. That’s how debate works. Simply kicking him out and hollering “safe and effective!” suggests that they’re scared shitless. What they’ve done over the last three years, all things considered, is bordering on treasonous; world leaders have been hanged for less. I suppose they can count themselves lucky that the British police are mostly occupied with arranging their collection of rainbow flags and trying not to offend anybody.
I wonder how many politicians are secretly dismayed at what’s going on? A majority, maybe? How many powerful people are sick of the whole shitshow and don’t want anything to do with the Great Reset agenda? Is it possible that we’re going to see a re-run of the Cromwell-era fracture and replacement of Parliament?
I wonder if he will be invited back?
Saying that, if he was allowed to say what he did about the jabs without the normal cutting off when it goes off script, it could mean they wanted the audience to hear it.
