Well, they kicked the whole thing off with child abuse. Logically, animal abuse is acceptable now.
The corporate fascists are at it again:
âThe Biden Administration is rewriting the history of COVID. Today, the head of OSHA claimed âwe didnât demand that anyone be firedâ despite issuing a worker vaccine mandate for 84 million Americans that was struck down by the Supreme Court. â
Latest paper by Denis Rancourt and colleagues.
Synchronicity between the many peaks in ACM (in 17 countries, on 4 continents, in all elderly age groups, at different times) and associated rapid booster rollouts allows this
2firm conclusion regarding causality, and accurate quantification of COVID-19-vaccine toxicity.
The all-ages vaccine-dose fatality rate (vDFR), which is the ratio of inferred vaccine- induced deaths to vaccine doses delivered in a population, is quantified for the January- February 2022 ACM peak to fall in the range 0.02 % (New Zealand) to 0.20 % (Uruguay). In Chile and Peru, the vDFR increases exponentially with age (doubling approximately every 4 years of age), and is largest for the latest booster doses, reaching approximately 5 % in the 90+ years age groups (1 death per 20 injections of dose 4). Comparable results occur for the Northern Hemisphere, as found in previous articles (India, Israel, USA).
We quantify the overall all-ages vDFR for the 17 countries to be (0.126 ± 0.004) %, which would imply 17.0 ± 0.5 million COVID-19 vaccine deaths worldwide, from 13.50 billion injections up to 2 September 2023. This would correspond to a mass iatrogenic event that killed (0.213 ± 0.006) % of the world population (1 death per 470 living persons, in less than 3 years), and did not measurably prevent any deaths.
Interview with him with Dr Peter McCullough.
Imagine that.
Notable:
"The report is part of ongoing efforts by the UKHSA, and other government departments, to digest the state of knowledge on NPI effectiveness in preparation for the next pandemic. However, as with a recent Royal Society Report current analyses have not yet focused on the wider social, economic, psychological and political impacts of NPIs.
The report fails to mention that public health research should, in principle, weigh the impact of specific interventions on a virus against their full societal impact, including their social harms and unintended consequences.
This myopic definition of âeffectivenessâ continues to hamper an intelligent and holistic assessment of whether NPIs were, all said and done, really the best of many bad options.
The decision to implement lockdown and the pandemonium of rules unleashed on the British public during the crisis were, in the end, political decisions."
The unintended consequences of COVID-19 vaccine policy: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good:
Rancourt is a bit of a crank, IMHO, but heâs far from stupid and the study design here is intriguing. By focusing on the southern hemisphere they removed a large confounding factor, and observing a similar result in multiple countries is a pretty strong signal even if their extrapolation has a wide margin of error (I think their own error estimate is unrealistically small).
As one expert on the subject famously observed: âa single death is a tragedy, a million deaths are a statisticâ. I suspect TPTB, or at least the national data collation wonks, are well aware of the level of mayhem caused by COVID vaccines, lockdowns, and all the rest of it, and what seems to be working very well for them is to simply ignore it until people forget about it.
There is (supposedly) a debate on the 20th of this month in Parliament addressing the subject of excess deaths. I wonder how many MPs will turn up? And I wonder if the UKHSA will be prosecuting themselves for imposing measures upon the public which were, by their own admission, unlawful by virtue of being pointless/harmful?
Interesting:
I am far from the first person suggesting that Pfizer, which aggressively marketed its COVID vaccines and underwrote a worldwide influence operation to mandate its product, may face ruinous liabilities.
Ed Dowd, a former asset manager, was one of the first people to realize that. He explained that legal protection granted to Pfizer by the PREP act will cease to protect it if significant fraud on the part of Pfizer is discovered .
Operation Sea-Spray comes to mind:
She had to delete them to make the phone work more efficiently. Therefore saving battery life and in turn doing her bit to stop global warming.
She passed her driving test. Credit due
For those that keep rehashing the argument that âevery healthcare organization on the planet recommended the clotshots,â just remember that it wasnât they who actually independently recommended them.
Those groups simply followed the US CDC, who in turn followed the pharma-stacked FDA. Those healthcare groups, and the worldâs doctors, never had full access to the original data at the time the sludge was pushed, so thereâs no way they were able to assess the validity of it. All they could do was follow the CDC, and under threat.
Ultimately, the major healthcare groups, and the worldâs doctors, only followed the Pfizer marketing, which meant that in truth only a handful of promotional folks at the drug companies were the ones actually recommending them, and not âthe worldâsâ scientists.
Traced back, only just a handful at Pfizer ârecommendedâ them. The CDC and all others just parroted the bodgy âresearchâ that Big Pharma spewed out to sell their shitty product.
The New York Times: The C.D.C. Isnât Publishing Large Portions of the Covid Data It Collects. The agency has withheld critical data on boosters, hospitalizations and, until recently, wastewater analyses.
Great news, NHS workers are refusing to get jabbed. I wonder what made them reach that decision?
https://twitter.com/james_freeman__/status/1718656886944203065
Assuming this is true, and with anything you link to I raise an eyebrow, why are people, especially medical professionals, still obsessed with getting everyone vaccinated to protect others? Itâs bizarre.
EDIT: Having reread it sheâs trying to protect her staff in this instance. OK, Iâll go along with that to a degree although it really isnât any of her business.
Are we reading the same letter? I donât see anything about protecting people.
There has been conflict between NHS management and the staff on the ground for years, and the tone of the letter illustrates why. I donât see any reason to doubt its authenticity because the NHS is still pushing this nonsense; my mum has had three texts already âremindingâ her to get a covid/flu booster.
Judith Paget (who is not medically qualified, FWIW) mysteriously appeared on the scene during Walesâs version of COVID clownworld and was most likely responsible for a lot of it; presumably sheâs been promoted to Chief Exec for the same sort of reason Susan Michie was.
Incidentally, if anyone wonders why Iâm not posting at my usual furious rate, Iâve broken my hand and have to refrain for a while.
In which case you need to read the letter again. Third paragraph.