I bet the baffled doctors are baffled at this baffling bafflement yet again.
Oh, and what do you know about it, eh? Do you have a degree in bafflement studies?
Saw something the other day about pilot deaths. Apparently Singapore airlines have lost five to sudden and baffling death over the last 7 months. Which would seem to be waaay more than you would expect. I just hope they have the courtesy to not die while Iâm on their plane.
Iâd really like to know what proportion of the general public consider these excess deaths a problem. I mean, in Taiwan itâs probably zero; most people either blindly trust what the authorities say or go off down genuinely-bizarre conspiracy-theory rabbitholes about aliens and stuff. But how about in the UK, where a whole load of popular figures have been raising the subject publicly?
2 Likes
They are going to make all injections and their new âcancer killing injectionsâ mRNA. The same cast of characters will be pushing that sludge on the useless eaters.
I got three months free gym membership by taking my shots as an eater. That wasnât useless.
1 Like
It saved me money. Plus I wasnât allowed to work out otherwise.
Yeah, the Taiwan Sports Adminstration were instrumental in subverting medical ethics, particularly where young and healthy people were concerned. Iâd like to know how that came about.
Mandate
The Sports Adminstration is part of the Ministry of Education, AFAIK. They have no legitimate authority to prescribe medical interventions, or to compel enrolment in medical experiments.
Iâm thinking nudges, winks and red envelopes were involved.
Iâm not sure how much red envelope corruption was involved in Taiwan. Obviously money was made in PPE. Not much in Taiwanese vaccines. I donât recall many of them being used. Possibly in stocks held by politicians in overseas big pharma.
Shutting down gyms was one of the most inexplicable parts of Taiwanâs âpandemic responseâ, along with masking up children and closing playgrounds. The particular demographic who go to gyms were at essentially zero risk from COVID, and the âexpertsâ knew that (if they didnât, they had no claim to be experts). And yet that shutdown persisted for months, along with the associated vaccine mandate.
The experts undoubtedly knew the vaccines didnât work, too.
So what was the point? Was it pure, unadulterated malice? Was there no point at all - just part of the death cult that seemed to grip the entire planet?
I mean FFS, if youâre going to hurt people and experiment on them, at least do it for profit. That at least is understandable. What kind of monster does that for no purpose whatsoever?
Something like that would be my guess. All the big players must have been up to their necks in insider trading - I mean, why wouldnât you? Bill Gates didnât even pretend to hide it. What I meant, though, was something along the lines of the Sports Administration being given emoluments to enact and enforce the necessary âmandatesâ, in order to take some of the heat off the CECC (who otherwise might have appeared to be a much-too-centralised source of bullshit). Possibly also some subtle threats involved, as elsewhere.
Appeasing the general public was never a factor?
In what sense? Are you referring to the vaccine rollout and the lies used to mandate those vaccines, or to the broader picture?
If they had wanted to reassure the public (Iâm not sure what the distinction would be between appeasing and reassuring) then they could have pointed to the statistics showing that children, for example, were at no risk from COVID; they could also have gone with the âit prevents severe disease but not transmissionâ schtick from the start. That would have resulted in a modest campaign to vaccinate âthe vulnerableâ, and everyone else would have felt able to take their silly masks off.
As things stand, theyâre not appeasing anybody. Theyâve pointed out in black and white that the vaccines didnât work at all - unless you take your latest booster youâre ânot protectedâ - and everyone is still walking around terrified of the dreaded lurgy.
If youâre talking about appeasing unfounded hysteria, that hysteria was created by the government in the first place. So the violations of Nuremberg that followed would simply have been a secondary crime on top of the first.
Youâre thinking of The Government as a hive mind with a single control point. Thatâs just not the reality (no matter how badly some people would like it to be).
1 Like
Yup, where is it? itâs vanished, along with several posts. Itâs bloody Mark Zuckerberg and Bill Gates, thatâs what it is.
1 Like