The question still remains, what the heck is that?
The number of subcultures here that remain—for most of us—out of sight is quite something.
Guy
Those who need to know what they are already know what they are. Those who don’t know…
The first rule of audio visual barbershops is you…
. . . steer clear!
Guy
Anybody know where the Chinese version is? I had a look around the CDC website but couldn’t find it. Might shed some light on the subject.
I asked the wife and she also doesn’t know.
Or she’s not telling you
But yeah. I can’t make head or tail of that last item. It’s got to be an obscure euphemism. Anybody here know some Tai Ke types they can ask?
酒店s, well those are just stores that sell booze, right?
What about the 小吃部s. Everyone needs a snack from time to time
Or, the 貓仔間s (niau-á-king; 臺語), since who doesn’t love to stroke the soft fur of a kitten.
Or she’s not telling you
I just had one of those moments with the wife.
Wife: Let’s go to the place on yangminshan where people watch the sunset. Supposed to be pretty. People always date there.
Me: been there many times have ya?
Wife: never, don’t be stupid. I’m not that type of girl. By the way don’t follow google maps when you get to bla bla bla, there is a short cut that saves you ten minutes.
Me:…
Her: my friend told me.
What would be the equivalent of a judicial review in Taiwan? It seems that one can file something of this sort directly to the judicial yuan?
If you get 處分ed, you can appeal the 處分 through the administrative court system (which like the civil and criminal court system belongs to the JY). Before doing that, you can also file a 訴願 with whichever organ of (administrative aka executive) government issued it or/and through the EY’s 訴願 committee and then appeal the result of the 訴願 through the administrative court system.
As for constitutional interpretations (by the CGJ apparently now they’re going by “Constitutional Court” in English), the criteria are listed here:
https://cons.judicial.gov.tw/jcc/en-us/categories/aprp/yxbwbhlwcm9jzxnz
A petition for an interpretation of the Constitution may be filed under one of the following circumstances:
Where a central or local government agency is uncertain regarding the application of the Constitution in exercising its powers, or, where the agency, while exercising its powers, is in dispute with another agency regarding the application of the Constitution, or where the agency is uncertain of the constitutionality of a particular law or order when applying it.
Where an individual, a legal person, or a political party, having exhausted all judicial remedies provided by law, alleges that her/his/its constitutional rights have been infringed upon and thereby questions the constitutionality of the law or order applied by the court of last resort in its final decision;
Where the members of the Legislative Yuan, in exercising their powers, are uncertain regarding the application of the Constitution or regarding the constitutionality of a particular law when applying the same, and at least one-third of the members of the Legislative Yuan have filed a petition; or
In accordance with Interpretation No.371, when any judge sincerely believes the statute or regulation at issue before the court is in conflict with the Constitution, the court may adjourn the proceedings sua sponte and petition the Constitutional Court to interpret the Constitutionality of the said statute or regulation.
Petition for Uniform Interpretation of Statutes and Regulations
A petition for a uniform interpretation of a law or order shall be made under one of the following circumstances:
Where a central or local government agency, in exercising its powers, applies a law or order and interprets the law or order in a different manner from an interpretation previously made by another agency or the same agency, unless the agency should be bound by the opinions of the same or another agency, or has the authority to revise the opinions of that agency; or
Where an individual, a legal person, or a political party alleges that her/his/its rights have been infringed upon, believing that the final decision of the court of last resort adopted an opinion in construing the applicable law or order that differed from that previously adopted by another court in a final decision, unless the petitioner has not yet exhausted all judicial remedies or the later decision has effectively altered the opinion of the earlier decision.
Petitions pursuant to the above-mentioned second circumstance shall be submitted within three months after the court’s decision becomes final.
Aside from the above, it is possible through the administrative court system to get the equivalent of a writ of mandamus. Before I read that the concept exists in Taiwan and has succeeded at least once (I forget what the case was about), one local lawyer told me there’s no such thing, so it seems to be rare.
Great stuff. Thanks yyy.
Am I the only one who finds this ridicuous?
1.Unless an exception applies, masks must be worn at all times when outside: people will not be required to wear a mask when doing exercises outdoors or taking individual/group photos indoors and outdoors, or if social distancing can be maintained and they do not have any COVID-19 symptoms.
Sure, the safest time to take the masks off is when the whole group is crowded together to fit in the frame while yelling “CHEESE!”…
You’d think folks would want a proper memento of 2021, with all of us wearing masks in our photos.
Guy
Am I the only one who finds this ridicuous?
No, you’re not the only one.
Does exercise outdoors include riding my UBike?
Does exercise outdoors include riding my UBike?
I assume so.
If not, just pull your phone out and take some selfies.
You could also at the same time pretend to be lecturing at a university, as this is one of the new categories to be mask-exempt (providing that social distance can be maintained)!
Guy
You could also at the same time pretend to be lecturing at a university, as this is one of the new categories to be mask-exempt
Huh, I totally missed that. Another somewhat contradictory measure: it’s the person talking loudly at the front who’s going to be a geyser of (hypothetical) virus particles, not the all-too-quiet students.
I guess we need to wait for university-level directives on this.
Btw, I found that tidbit somewhat buried in this story from today’s Taipei Times:
CECC reports first case of ‘Delta-plus’ infection - Taipei Times
The first case of the COVID-19 subvariant dubbed “Delta plus” has been recorded in Taiwan, the Central Epidemic Command Center (CECC) told a news briefing yesterday. AY.4.2, which is a mutation of the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, was discovered in...
Guy
Are beauty parlors (which are to remain closed) different from hair salons? Must be, because all the hair salons I see in my area have definitely been open for awhile.