You can probably find some inspiration on the Beaver of the Day thread.
What is this? TV?
you donāt need a license to watch cable tv, you just need to pay extra for porn per view
Some of us prefer bearsā¦
i hear theyāre over on chaturbate these days
Thereās a thread full of those. Maybe go like a few posts?
Itās weird you picked up on that - Iād never thought of the distinction before and had to look it up. 
I initially thought it was a German thing (frei vs kostenlos), but it seems to be more of a software thing?
The English adjective free is commonly used in one of two meanings: āat no monetary costā ( gratis ) and āwith little or no restrictionā ( libre ). This ambiguity of free can cause issues where the distinction is important, as it often is in dealing with laws concerning the use of information, such as copyright and patents.
There are licences for use, such that a fee or royalty is passed back to the supplier/creator, and there is a licence allowing you to do something, such as law, or medicine, or drive a vehicle that could yourself or someone else killed.
Some rights are, uh, righter than others. I would often model possible gun regulation on that of vehicles, as itās all a matter of momentum. Gun rights advocates whip out the 2nd amendments, a poor excuse. I donāt want to take them away, I want more of the owners to be more responsible, and I want all of them insured.
Weāre talking about the Internet. Of which should be free.
Call it the tragedy of the commons, then. I think it should not.
I mean, they let anybody in here, take me for exampleā¦
Just noticed this part, so Iām going back to like the first post. Seems like it might be hard to get to ten though. Iāve only done it once, apparently.
I donāt know what you have against Mr. Master and his friend Zandora. Theyāre both consenting adults and å·®äøå¤ human, but you would banish them to a life of chastity nonetheless? I think you may be living in the wrong century. 
Your presence is welcome.
Bad, watch the interviews with Ted Bundy.
Cheers 
But we would not want a child just entering any of these conversations, more is the point that we do not want someone behaving childishly in these conversations, or on the road as we head cross to 711
They wouldnāt be giving licences to children. Itās the parentās responsibility to rear their children correctly.
another thing people should require licenses for: having children
Doesnāt that mean that the gov and parents should do a better job? Donāt drag porno down just because other people arenāt doing their jobs.
Sex might be taught in class, but desire, not.
The definition of healthy changes everyday. Youād be surprised what āhealthyā meant in the 60s. Plus those kids are not as naive as you thought. They might engage in physical interaction after they meet on the Internet.
All of those happened in the past, when women are seen as an object, used to produce babies, have no votes, canāt inherit the family, etc. And it seems to me that this is based on a presumption that pornography is for men.
Iām not against what youāve said. Iām just having questions in the case youāve built.
One of my favorite movies <3