Free pornography, a discussion

Discussion Open Forum
41

You can probably find some inspiration on the Beaver of the Day thread.

1 Like
42

What is this? TV?

43

you don’t need a license to watch cable tv, you just need to pay extra for porn per view

44

image
image724×184 9.16 KB

1 Like
45

Some of us prefer bears…

46

i hear they’re over on chaturbate these days

1 Like
47

There’s a thread full of those. Maybe go like a few posts?

1 Like
48

It’s weird you picked up on that - I’d never thought of the distinction before and had to look it up. :slight_smile:

I initially thought it was a German thing (frei vs kostenlos), but it seems to be more of a software thing?

The English adjective free is commonly used in one of two meanings: “at no monetary cost” ( gratis ) and “with little or no restriction” ( libre ). This ambiguity of free can cause issues where the distinction is important, as it often is in dealing with laws concerning the use of information, such as copyright and patents.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.howtogeek.com/howto/31717/what-do-the-phrases-free-speech-vs.-free-beer-really-mean/amp/

2 Likes
49

There are licences for use, such that a fee or royalty is passed back to the supplier/creator, and there is a licence allowing you to do something, such as law, or medicine, or drive a vehicle that could yourself or someone else killed.

Some rights are, uh, righter than others. I would often model possible gun regulation on that of vehicles, as it’s all a matter of momentum. Gun rights advocates whip out the 2nd amendments, a poor excuse. I don’t want to take them away, I want more of the owners to be more responsible, and I want all of them insured.

1 Like
50

We’re talking about the Internet. Of which should be free.

1 Like
51

Call it the tragedy of the commons, then. I think it should not.

I mean, they let anybody in here, take me for example…

52

Just noticed this part, so I’m going back to like the first post. Seems like it might be hard to get to ten though. I’ve only done it once, apparently.

1 Like
53

I don’t know what you have against Mr. Master and his friend Zandora. They’re both consenting adults and 差不多 human, but you would banish them to a life of chastity nonetheless? I think you may be living in the wrong century. :2cents:

Dungeon Master winking at Zandora

1 Like
54

Your presence is welcome.

55

Bad, watch the interviews with Ted Bundy.

56

Cheers :smiley:

But we would not want a child just entering any of these conversations, more is the point that we do not want someone behaving childishly in these conversations, or on the road as we head cross to 711

57

They wouldn’t be giving licences to children. It’s the parent’s responsibility to rear their children correctly.

58

another thing people should require licenses for: having children

2 Likes
59

Doesn’t that mean that the gov and parents should do a better job? Don’t drag porno down just because other people aren’t doing their jobs.

Sex might be taught in class, but desire, not.

The definition of healthy changes everyday. You’d be surprised what “healthy” meant in the 60s. Plus those kids are not as naive as you thought. They might engage in physical interaction after they meet on the Internet.

All of those happened in the past, when women are seen as an object, used to produce babies, have no votes, can’t inherit the family, etc. And it seems to me that this is based on a presumption that pornography is for men.

I’m not against what you’ve said. I’m just having questions in the case you’ve built.

4 Likes
60

One of my favorite movies <3

1 Like