Upfront equipment costs and monthly fees are heavy for Starlink.
ASTS will become a better solution and service all cell providers in the US with as-you-use fees.
It’s coming to India, Japan (successful test with Rakuten Phone), and other countries eventually, but timewise you probably should do Taiwan’s starlink version as likely to the market earlier.
Still same dead lock like in South Africa and Namibia where local majority ownership is required for that.
Since Starlink won’t change their policy of 100% ownership, it is up to the local politicians to pass legislation that allows exceptions to the current law (Article 36 of the Telecommunications Management Act).
In Taiwan the LY is currently largely ineffective because the ruling party does not have necessary majority to pass anything meaningful.
Coverage can come in a few forms. The cell carriers may have pay-as-you-use for X amount of days for full coverage (would be incremental, like paying X amount for Y gigabytes of extra data), or just tack on coverage for free under current billing in order to promote 100% coverage. The end user will just have to deal with cell carrier and Not a separate company like Starlink.
Yes, this will help for areas currently without coverage, like deserts, mountains, and ocean. Forest firefighters and EMTers will also be using it for the complete coverage.
The arguments from politicians are not very convincing. Mobile networks can’t replace satellite connectivity.
And the censorship ambitions to avoid fraud are lame. Fraud is still very present in Taiwan, the government won’t win this game of cat and mouse.
We don’t need same censorship as China to fight crime.
Looks like some insider local business groups are lobbying hard to try and get a monopoly on satellite services , bs arguments about cybercrime. We have seen this playbook in so many industries here.
We need a choice of various satellite providers for defense purposes as well as to lower costs.