Hypocritical "family value" Republicans

It’s easy to figure out what Republicans are “for” – just take the opposite of every f*cking thing that they say. If they’re for “freedom in Iraq” they’ll be the first ones telling us that what happened at Abu Ghraib or in Gitmo is “nothing worse than what happens at a frat hazing”. If they’re for “life” then, of course that’s a selective concept that does not extend to death’s row, foreigners or anybody that poses inconvenience to their other hodge-podge of an ideology. If they’re for “education” you know that they’re planning a world in which privileged kids in little lord fauntleroy outfits cavort about a fountain in-between latin lessons. If they’re for “family values” it’s probably just a mental typographical error for “coprophageal fun with teenage midgets” but it sure as hell has nothing to do with what normal Americans think of as “family values”.

Given how strong the Republicans are about demonizing every other segment of society for political gain while touting their own false moral credentials, they are the height of lying sh*tbag hypocrisy. The world may be full of people with very flawed or unkind personal guiding philosophies, but it takes a Republican to spend endless years railing about something “horrible” all the while doing it himself.

From that standpoint, the Republicans get extra culpability points because they simply can’t argue that they don’t know they’re doing something wrong. After all, these are the guys who are simultanteously proclaiming themselves the world’s experts on the wrongness of what they’re doing.

Ha ha ha. I never screwed any hookers, I only made a bunch of phone calls to the bordello. :laughing:

Today’s Spin

[quote]Sen. David Vitter broke a week of silence on Monday and, with his wife by his side, denied allegations he had relationships with New Orleans prostitutes.

Media reports surfaced in the past week linking the Louisiana senator to a well-known prostitution case in New Orleans. Vitter attributed those charges to “long-term political enemies” and people seeking money.

“Those stories are not true,” he said. . .

Vitter, 46, acknowledged in a statement last Monday that his number was included in the telephone records of an escort service run by Deborah Jeane Palfrey, a woman dubbed by the news media as the “D.C. Madam.”[/quote]

Yesterday’s Confession

[quote]Vitter said the incident was “a very serious sin in my past for which I am, of course, completely responsible.”

“Several years ago, I asked for and received forgiveness from God and from my wife in confession and marriage counseling.”

“No matter how long ago it was, I know this has hurt the relationship of trust I’ve enjoyed with so many of you,” he said. “I will work everyday to rebuild that trust.”

. . . he’s been “trying to live up to the important values we believe” since admitting to his mistakes.

Vitter’s wife, Wendy, told reporters she had forgiven her husband . . . “I made the decision to love him and to recommit to our marriage. To forgive is not always the easy choice, but it was, and is, the right choice for me,” she said.[/quote]
link

So why was he calling them? To talk dirty? Trying to order a pizza but got the wrong number. . . five different times? Don’t forget he said he committed a “very serious sin” with respect to this matter. Isn’t lying also a sin? :s

Jimmy Swaggart said that all those prostitutes were just so he could whack off in front of them… yeah, right. Believe that and I’ll get you a Ferrari owner who doesn’t like cars or driving.

[quote=“mofangongren”]It’s easy to figure out what Republicans are “for” – just take the opposite of every f*cking thing that they say. If they’re for “freedom in Iraq” they’ll be the first ones telling us that what happened at Abu Ghraib or in Gitmo is “nothing worse than what happens at a frat hazing”. If they’re for “life” then, of course that’s a selective concept that does not extend to death’s row, foreigners or anybody that poses inconvenience to their other hodge-podge of an ideology. If they’re for “education” you know that they’re planning a world in which privileged kids in little lord fauntleroy outfits cavort about a fountain in-between latin lessons. If they’re for “family values” it’s probably just a mental typographical error for “coprophageal fun with teenage midgets” but it sure as hell has nothing to do with what normal Americans think of as “family values”.

Given how strong the Republicans are about demonizing every other segment of society for political gain while touting their own false moral credentials, they are the height of lying sh*tbag hypocrisy. The world may be full of people with very flawed or unkind personal guiding philosophies, but it takes a Republican to spend endless years railing about something “horrible” all the while doing it himself.

From that standpoint, the Republicans get extra culpability points because they simply can’t argue that they don’t know they’re doing something wrong. After all, these are the guys who are simultanteously proclaiming themselves the world’s experts on the wrongness of what they’re doing.[/quote]

I nominate the first paragraph for a classic post. The other two are good, but holy hell that first one had my laughing and nodding in agreement.

He just get together with hookers from outside the city limits!

Speaking of Republican hypocrisy, it was Vitter’s wife who was so adamant that Hilary Clinton was such a bad wife for standing by her man in the wake of infidelity. Where’s all that Lorena Bobbitt catty talk she was spouting back then?

So, Vitter feels it’s fine to throw her 2 cents in on somebody else’s marriage in the wake of an infidelity but then it turns out that she’s playing out the whole f*cking Tammy Wynette song note-for-note.

HOOOAHHHH!!! Another closeted sex fiend from the Family Values Party.

[quote]Senator Larry E. Craig, Republican of Idaho, pleaded guilty to a disorderly conduct charge earlier this month after his arrest in June by an undercover police officer in a men’s bathroom at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport. . .

According to a police report obtained by Roll Call, the Capitol Hill newspaper that disclosed the episode and guilty plea today, a plainclothes police officer investigating complaints of sexual activity in the bathroom arrested the senator on June 11 after what the officer described as sexual advances made by Mr. Craig from an adjoining stall. . .

Mr. Craig, who is married and has three children. . . publicly rejected allegations by a gay rights advocate that he had engaged in a homosexual behavior, calling them “completely ridiculous.” [/quote]

nytimes.com/2007/08/28/washi … ref=slogin

Nah, just more blatant hypocricy from the “family values” set. Gutless fucker can’t erven admit to being gay. I suppose in his mind he’s not gay, but no doubt he’s slept with plenty of blokes who are.

HG

Who’s homophobic, me for posting a news article on a(nother) hypocritical, conservative Senator who has taken every opportunity to oppose gay-friendly legislation, on the grounds that he’s a great supporter of “family values” and who pleaded guilty to cruising for blowjobs in a public restroom, but adamantly denies that he’s gay, despite the clear evidence that he is, or the lying, hypocritical Senator?

[quote]Craig’s voting record has earned him top ratings from social conservative groups such as the American Family Association, Concerned Women for America and the Family Research Council.

He has supported a federal constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage, telling his colleagues that it was “important for us to stand up now and protect traditional marriage, which is under attack by a few unelected judges and litigious activists.”

In 1996, Craig also voted in favor of the Defense of Marriage Act, which denies federal recognition to same-sex marriages and prevents states from being forced to recognize the marriages of gay and lesbian couples legally performed in other states.

Craig has also opposed expanding the federal hate crimes law to cover offenses motivated by anti-gay bias and, in 1996, voted against a bill that would have outlawed employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, which failed by a single vote in the Senate. [/quote]
cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/08/27/ … pstoryview

Doesn’t that make him homophobic? Hypocrital, fearful, closeted, gay and homophobic?

And a liar? In response to the latest incident, Craig released a statement saying his actions were misconstrued. If that’s the case, it seems a bit odd that he pleaded guilty. Moreover, if his actions were really miscontrued, that’s apparently something that happens to him repeatedly. Here’s a YouTube video from 1982 in which Craig denies being part of a House page sex scandal. Here, last October, is Michael Rogers of BlogActive alleging that he has met with several men who claim to have had sex with Craig. And here is some interesting commentary out of Idaho on the last round of allegations.

I’ve got nothing against closeted gays; I can understand that completely. I just object to closeted, hypocritical, homophobic gay lawmakers who strenuously deny rumors of their homosexuality, proclaim their deepest faith and devotion to “family values” (ie., one man, one woman, married with children), and make every effort to make life difficult for other homosexuals by voting against the very practices that they are secretly committing.

For a pleasant change, I am in complete agreement with MT here.

Too bad that Craig didn’t decide to fight this one out to the end… it would have been an interesting specatacle to help educate children as to the true nature of the Republican party in its current incarnation.

Following Rovian traditions, the first step in all this would be for Craig to smear his opponents with as much shit as possible. Easiest of course would be for him to do it with his or his sex-partner’s erect penis, taking care not to get any poo on any children in the room. The second step would be to claim that any criticism of Craig as a hypocrite is “homophobic”. The third step will be for Craig to claim in front of a church congregation that he is now “cured” and will be ministered to by Ted Haggard personally.

Spring cleaning.

[quote]Representative Rick Renzi, Republican of Arizona, was indicted this week by a federal grand jury on 35 counts of corruption, including fraud, money laundering, extortion and other crimes, federal prosecutors said Friday.

Federal prosecutors said Mr. Renzi had sought to enrich himself and to finance his re-election campaigns in part by selling fraudulent insurance policies. . .

Mr. Renzi, 49, is among several lawmakers to be indicted or placed under federal investigation in recent months.

Representative John T. Doolittle, Republican of California, announced last month that he would not seek re-election, a sign that he is likely to face criminal charges in a Congressional lobbying scandal. Representative Don Young and Senator Ted Stevens, Republicans from Alaska, have been under investigation for their ties to a businessman who has admitted bribing public officials. . .[/quote]
nytimes.com/2008/02/23/washi … ref=slogin

Here we go again. . .

[quote]Senator John Ensign, Republican of Nevada, admitted Tuesday that he had an extramarital affair with a member of his campaign staff. . . The woman’s husband was a member of Mr. Ensign’s official Senate staff. . .

Mr. Ensign, 51, is married and has three children. He and his wife, Darlene, were active for a time in Promise Keepers, a Christian evangelical ministry that promotes strong families and marriages. [/quote]
nytimes.com/2009/06/17/us/po … f=politics

Why he’s a hypocrite?

So how about you, Senator Ensign? How much credibility do you have left? Are you going to step down?

[quote=“Mother Theresa”]

So how about you, Senator Ensign? How much credibility do you have left? Are you going to step down?[/quote]

Of course not- he’s going to follow the standard pattern-have a press conference, preferably with dutiful wifey standing beside, blame it all on the evil libural society for leading him to temptation, shed a few tears, ask Jeebus for forgiveness, and wait for the hail of replies from fundy preachers explaining how it’s ok to be a lying adulterous hypocrite as long as you really really hate faggots.

[quote=“MikeN”][quote=“Mother Theresa”]

So how about you, Senator Ensign? How much credibility do you have left? Are you going to step down?[/quote]

Of course not- he’s going to follow the standard pattern-have a press conference, preferably with dutiful wifey standing beside, blame it all on the evil libural society for leading him to temptation, shed a few tears, ask Jeebus for forgiveness, and wait for the hail of replies from fundy preachers explaining how it’s ok to be a lying adulterous hypocrite as long as you really really hate faggots.[/quote]

Maybe he should run for the Presidency in 2012 instead. Having extramarital affairs, while espousing family values, is about par for presidential candidates.

This guy is apparently a member of that cult known as the Promise Keepers. One of their central tenets is to be “committed to building strong marriages and families through love, protection and Biblical values.” Another is to be “committed to practicing spiritual, moral, ethical and sexual purity.”

Interesting.

Well, at least he didn cheat on his wife while she was dying of cancer. Oh, wait a sec. If he did that, he might be like John Edwards. :laughing: Of course, he woud also have to preen his hair for minutes and minutes on end.

What Ensign did was wrong, but what Edwards did was sickening. And the Dims thought this guy was VP material? :laughing:

It’s a bad sign when the modern-day Republican party breathes a collective sigh of relief when its latest scandal doesn’t involve pedophilia or public toilet sex. Gotta be amused by a party that puts Newt Gingrich to be the chief spokesman on the value of traditional marriage in the midst of the Prop. 8 fight in California – a guy who ran to his wife’s hospital deathbed to demand she sign divorce papers so he could marry yet another of the chicks he was banging.

This got me thinking – what ever came of Ted Klaudt? Turns out that the Republican politician (South Dakota House of Reps 1999 to 2006) was sentenced to 44 years in prison for his rape of a bunch of young kids – 11 years times 4 counts of 2nd degree rape in Hughes County, plus a plea bargain in which he pled guilty to witness tampering in Corson County.

Let’s keep hoping that future elections will continue to involve “values voters” because it just means that the Dems will keep whuppin’ the Republicans at this rate. Not that I wouldn’t want the Republicans to get better – if the Republicans really cared about cleaning house they would. However, if the recent past is any guidance the GOP is still in denial mode – looking back at the Mark Foley situation, top Republican leaders knew all about his child-predatory acts and chose to look the other way so long as it was convenient. And the federal prosecutors who dared to investigate Duke Cunningham and other Republican bribe-takers faced the chopping block under Alberto Gonzales.

Newt Gingrich.

Ted Klaudt? JEEZUS!!!

Not that it’s relevant in any way, but look at the guy!


daylife.com/photo/0fqU1WzfRq2TR

Seriously, that’s the guy you referred to – the former Republican lawmaker that pushed for all kinds of anti-pedophile legislation while he was busy fucking his underage foster daughters. I’d say the guy has issues.