Hmmm. Didn’t age well.
Taking LindellTV as gospel will do that to a man though.
That depends on whether you think financial crimes are worse than pedophilia or not.
1 Like
What’s your moral standard? The most harmed? Kant? What? Or just your personal view?
hopefully you have something better in mind than a false dilemma.
Why? It seems to be going that way. I think it will come down to money and the victims will be ignored.
You think anything new will be released from the DoJ? You’ll be satisfied when only dems are hounded?
Sher
I think what we will see is something released by DOJ which is heavily skewed towards the dems, and the investigations the same, and they’ll shred and burn anything about dumpy before the next admin comes in
If Trump knew there was nothing about him, he wouldn’t have tried so hard to stop it coming out. If he’s encouraging it to come out now, only a fool would trust it is unfiltered
1 Like
How dumb are these people
1 Like
You can start here. Slag away. Summers should be investigated, right? Why would he resign, right? Should the DoJ release the names of his victims, if there are any?
You should be fully on board with that right? No apple too small.
But whatabout Hunter Biden
1 Like
Yes obviously? Myself and numerous other non-Trump-worshipping posters have stated this exact thing. The Epstein debacle transcends (R) vs (D) warfare for all but the most partisan.
What strikes me as so strange is that you seem to think that what you are suggesting is a big ask; this easily translates to you projecting, by the way.
I think I am just not as partisan as you are, and I am proud of that.
Why would a cover up of JE look any different? You think too small of you think individual people matter all that much.
And a dog can lick its own balls. So?
And yet I’ve never given a pass to anyone. 
Is this your updated version of the “I know you are but what am I” schoolyard quip?
A pox upon Trump for making this normalized, even seem fashionable among his adult supporters.
Oh really now. I don’t think most here would agree, but of course you are entitled to your own opinions.
And you speak for most, you of those higher less partisan moral standards?
You must be a proud boy.
1 Like
My moral compass tells me that raping children is far worse than blackmail. I regard any moral compass that points in the opposite direction to be faulty.
Um
Pretty sure “you” is a personal pronoun, so…
1 Like
Powerful men robbing billions from millions as they starve or lose their jobs and homes is fairly morally inconsistent with good citizenry.
I think the discussion is large enough to include both without doing a Pepsi challenge on them. I’d like to hear more about your single victim theory though. Because it opens a door into a moral thought experiment about cancer drugs and human testing— amount others. Does the test stop when one person dies or one rabbit? Is a vile act more or less vile when enacted physically on a person? how about a vile act that robs people of their rights and possessions? Physical Harm may damage one person for sure, but robbing a man of his life savings and job might wreck his family and cause harm in numerous ways to his family. If you want to make a moral comparison, size and scope should come into play.
Otherwise, it’s just you with just like your opinion, man.
Anywho, back on task:
The Jeffrey Epstein Story is Beginning to Smell Like Russiagate
For the record I’m very much in favor of releasing any Epstein files. The country deserves to know whatever there is to know about this mess, and if it exposes systemic wrongdoings, those need fixing. However, it’s extremely suspicious that a story that was deader than Epstein himself for years is suddenly the Most Important Thing now that Trump is back in the White House, especially since a lot of the techniques used to drive a media panic in the first Trump term are back. The fact that some of Trump’s top officials stoked public outrage about this subject en route to higher office does change the karmic equation this time, however.
Between Epstein’s beyond-suspicious death, multiple prosecutions for sex crimes, inexplicable $600 million fortune, and breathtaking Rolodex of powerful friends, there’s a lot to be curious about. But the public’s fascination with Epstein is based on the notion that he was not only operating an organized blackmail ring, but doing so on behalf of intelligence agencies, probably Israeli. That story simply isn’t there yet, and a lot of people who should know better, myself included, have assumed it is. It could be true, which is why releasing documents is a good idea. As of now, though, it’s closer to Russiagate, in which confirmable facts are overshadowed by a mountain range of inference:
1 Like
A huge campaign promise of Trump, Vance, and those in their ideological orbit was to release the Epstein Files. People - many of whom at least in part voted for Trump/Vance due to this issue - want them to follow through on that promise.
It’s really not much more complicated than that.
3 Likes
Instead, they suddenly announced the case was closed, stupid, a hoax, etc etc
2 Likes
Which Streisand Effected the hell out of it, and led many voters to feeling duped, exactly.
Of course the Left dogpiles on to this self-inflicted vulnerability, but why would they not?
2 Likes