The aging trainers, built domestically by Aerospace Industrial Development Corporation (AIDC) in the 1980s, have been involved in 15 accidents, resulting in the death of 10 pilots. According to AIDCâs website, a total of 63 AT-3s were built.
15 out of 63, mmh, would you want to train on one of those?
Training ejecting, maybe? But seriously, 25% seems to be a very bad track record. Sad about the young pilot.
Still a better safety record than the F-104 Starfighter aka âErdnagel (Earth Nail)â or âWitwenmacher (Widow Maker)â in German service, where ~32% were lost in accidents, killing 116 pilots Come to think of it, somewhere in my old Germany home I still have some burnt zipper fragments from a pilotâs flight suit that were picked up after one of the many crashesâŚ
Yep, most of the 116 German dead pilots were single it seems. At least 30 of them had widows and other family, though, to whom Lockheed paid compensation.
I see that. I was wondering why they would be liable, as the plane had long service and its known failings were part of a trade-off for performance. It was only a $1.2 million settlement without admitting liability, so I guess they wanted to end the issue with the bribery scandal coming to light that year, or just to be done with it.
Yep, that could be. Additionally, as far as I understand, the huge attrition rate in Europe was also due to using the plane as a low-altitude fighter-bomber - a role it was not designed for at all (designed instead as high-altitude interceptor). And also pilot errors, lacking maintenance capabilities, issues with locally produced (spare-)parts, and many other factors that are probably not directly Lockheedâs fault.