I don’t think there’s any bad blood between Britain and Australia, for example. Or Britain and Canada. Or Britain and NZ.
And that’s that the overwhelming majority (if not all) of the present-day populations of the place quoted are made up of imported colonials, rather than indigenous peoples who were there beforehand.
Of course, transplanted white people are going to be OK with the colonial power who basically put them there.
Only 20% view them unfavorably. How’s that terrible? And you seem to be missing Nigeria and Kenya. They aren’t populated by British colonists.
Their ancestries are not necessarily British.
Besides, you are conveniently leaving out Hong Kong and Singapore. These are just the British ex-colonies. You can find the same views in a bunch of Spanish and Portuguese ex-properties. So put that in your pipe and smoke it.
Eh, we can go back and forth with examples and counter examples. A lot of former colonies in Africa are very against their colonizers. Libya doesn’t care for Italy… Rwanda does not have good feelings about Belgium. Ukraine hates Russia. And don’t ask what Israel’s neighbors think about their brief occupations of land in Lebanon, Egypt, Syria, etc.
Who doesn’t?
You could write a tome about how different colonizers have impacted indigenous food of the countries they were occupying. Very fascinating stuff.