A member already put in a written submission to the government over dual citizenship I believe and it went nowhere. Nice to see you are willing to actually do something while others just do nothing. reminds me of your fights with HSBC and other banks.
There are a few threads on it already.
Never in the history of UK immigration and nationality law has the British government had any prohibition on dual nationality.
The bottom line in Taiwan is: The Taiwanese want dual citizenship for themselves and they allow and encourage it. What they don’t want is a bunch of white or dark brown people running around the island destroying the imaginary ethnic purity of the place. Distasteful as it is, it’s as simple as that. And don’t give me the military service argument ! You guys should take…
No Change. A Polish guy who could not renounce did it the year before like this and so have others.
或者我們乾脆請美國國會議員立個「互不惠」條款，
針對絕對比我們多的台灣到美國的移民，
要求其放棄台灣國籍。
Or perhaps let’s just ask U.S. Congressmen to make a retaliatory
law directed at the much more numerous Taiwanese immigrants to the
USA, asking them to give up their Taiwanese citizenship.
自作自受。 A taste of Taiwan’s own
medicine. I bet e.g., 我猜如
http://www.fapa.org/ 台灣人公共事務會（FAPA）
會有很多意見 would have a lot
of opinions.
呼籲台灣立法委員們：第九條：得不償失。
So Taiwan legislators: Article 9: it’s not worth it.
Okay, I’ll try one more time, this time highlighting certain words:
From the syllabus of Afroyim v. Rusk ([color=#000080]U. S. Supreme Court[/color], 1967):
[quote]Petitioner, of Polish birth, became a naturalized American citizen in 1926. He went to Israel in 1950 and in 1951 voted in an Israeli legislative election. The State Department subsequently refused to renew his passport, maintaining that petitioner had lost his citizenship by virtue of 401 (e) of the Nationality Act of 1940 which p…