I was thinking more Kleinfelters Syndrome.
This is classic lol
1 Like
We used to take the piss out of the Russians when they had old leaders such as Andropov etc. in the early 80s. Now they are laughing their ass off at us.
Hilarious. And very, very truthy. 
Vamos, el Jeffe.
Lost Jon Stewart.
What can you do but laugh when the Democrats tell Hispanics they have no voice? Deny them the opportunity to ask questions? I mean, hello? 
And this kind of thing is fast becoming a hallmark of the Biden Presidency. 
For starters, Biden showed up an hour late to the Zoom call, according to a source familiar with the meeting, and it didn’t get much better from there.
Jonathan Chait weighs in
This response is sadly consistent with the behavior of aging leaders who refuse to sacrifice their power for the greater good. Ruth Bader Ginsburg insisted on her own indispensability, as if the cause of liberalism would suffer by replacing her with a younger, non-cancer-stricken jurist. Dianne Feinstein denied her own cognitive decline to the point where she was too impaired to recognize her own impairment, surrounded by aides whose professional incentive was to sustain the illusion of competence.
This is the trajectory Biden’s campaign is following. If it continues, the presidency will probably fall into Trump’s lap as easily as Ginsburg’s Supreme Court seat did.
You can be a rebel or a part of a rebellion. You cannot be both.
Btw, it’s not as tho Trump doesn’t present as exactly the same. Only EYE can solve the world! 
‘It’s over’: Democrats remain in panic over Biden’s reelection
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/07/12/biden-gop-election-wave-00167944
Biden campaign against Trumps free speech rights on social media lol.
In a statement first provided to The Hill, the campaign called the move “greedy” and “reckless,” arguing that it is an attack on democracy to include the former president on the popular platforms.
Restoring his access is like handing your car keys to someone you know will drive your car into a crowd and off a cliff,” Charles Lutvak, the Biden campaign’s national spokesperson, said. “It is holding a megaphone for a bonafide racist who will shout his hate and white supremacy from the rooftops and try to take it mainstream. Without question, it is a direct attack on our safety and our democracy.”
God these guys are full of themselves. They sound like prisoners after a riot when the guards are coming back in.
“[Donald Trump ](https://thehill.com/people/donafair and square,” Lutvak said. “The lies he spread on this platform stoked the mob that assaulted police officers. Five people died.”
Ahh, the near smear. 
Why not smear him with this, which also happened under his charge?
At least 25 Americans were killed during protests and political unrest in 2020
Can someone explain this lifting of restrictions on FB?
As far as I can see on his public page he’s been posting regularly since at least last year.
So what is it that has
changed?
Meta Platforms Inc. stock price has been trending down.
Al Sharpton is finally realizing Biden is a racist. First he ignores a black woman at a rally, ignored her to talk only to white people.
Now doesn’t speak with black reporters. Well Al, Joe Biden didn’t want to send his children to schools with blacks cause that would be in a racial jungle.
META is no longer interfering in elections, like blocking Hunter Biden’s laptop stories banned on FB, or banning Trump or banning accounts that questioned the origins of covid. ( Much like forumosa lol ) Zuckerberg no longer can spend US$400 million to buy a US election.
I strongly believe in free speech (except when it really hurts other people, and I don’t mean but-hurt but really hurting), but I even more believe in free to do what you want with what you own.
If Zuckerberg wants to use his platform for influencing the US election, he should be allowed. If the company loses money due to this strategy, then the board and share holders will kick him out, so he should be able to do what he wants as long as he is trusted by the owners to do it.
Same with Trump, Musk… whoever “owns” something.
The point is that Meta is one channel, like CNN, while X is another channel like Fox News. So the free speech is not impacted as one can chose the channel to follow
Just my view, no need to agree with me
Edit: as was corrected below, Zuckerberg actually owns the full control of the company through shares voting rights, so definitely he should be allowed to run the company the way he wants in my view
Sure, another view is that such large tech companies have such strong monopoly power in the public square that there’s a public interest in maintaining openness and free speech for all under their roof, outside of hurting people as you say.