Or perhaps the editor doesn’t want to write out the insane acronym in an article title. If only you applied this level of skepticism in your other posts, you wouldn’t make the mistakes you’ve made.
Excellent point! Two lesbian lovers, one self-proclaimed transgender are suing because of biological gender?! How dare they!
Gender is no longer a biological reality, it’s a state of mind!
They need to do the respectful and right thing and wait until their child is three years old and ask they/them/it how they/them/it identifies! All could be good depending on the answer.
Total BS to call this a hate crime. No racial bias was proven. She incorrectly thought some kid stole her iPhone and she tackled him and called the police. It just so happens that the kid was black. So what?!
Would it have been labeled a hate crime if the woman was black and the kid was white? No way. How about white on white or black on black? No way. Just one asshole falsely accusing another of a crime, which if turned into a physical altercation should be punished. But a hate crime? Not unless she repeatedly called him the N-word and suggested that he stole her phone because of the black peoples’ propensity for thievery. She didn’t do any of that.
It seems that any missteps against a person of color by a white can now be incorrectly labeled a hate crime. Because, you know BLM.