Russian Colonel Alexander Bespalov is at least the 9th Russian senior commander killed in action since February.
He commanded the 59th Guards Tank Regiment, part of the Russian army’s 144th Guards Motorized Rifle Division.
3 Likes
Rot In Pieces
4 Likes
Can’t find any English reports yet, but Ukraine claims that a Battle Tactical Group of Russia’s 70th Motorized rifle regiment of the 42th Guards Motorized Rifle Division have been annihilated in Donetsk.
Most of the members of the BTG were from the Caucasus and have participated in Syria. The commander and his chief of staff were killed in their BMP-3.
1 Like
I heard an interview in which the US military guy explained how the Ukrainians are doing this (yes, there’s a strategy). As an example, Russia has these long convoys. They take out the first tank or truck and the convoy comes to a halt. The Russian military is very top-down so nobody does anything until somebody with authority goes to the front of the convoy to tell everybody what to do. The snipers then do their work.
It was something like this. If this is correct, what f(*&ing idiots the Russians are.
4 Likes
I have a hunch US and other western allies are radioing their coordinates.
3 Likes
They don’t have radios? 
I’ve heard that the commanders are close to the action because of how they operate, but going to the front of a convoy seems to be too much of a risk taking.
Another theory I have heard is that one reason for the alleged brutality of Russian soldiers is that they are treated very badly by their superiors themselves (including being raped). But that is, of course, highly speculative. Sucks to be a Russian foot soldier or tank operator, for sure.
1 Like
They have radios, but that doesn’t mean the troops do what they’re told to do.
Anyway, there must be some reason for the unprecedented loss of senior staff.
2 Likes
From a famous video:
But to add a bit except for a silly screenshot, here is a bit about how the Ukrainians overcame this Soviet era stupidity which was prevalent in both RU and UKR:
1 Like
the reality of the russian soldiers and their brutality comes from the fact that Putin’s military operates in the way of siphoning man power from Russia’s poorest areas. These guys fighting for Russia are generally damn poor as hell, some even stated they are willing to take the risk just for 50usd a month. These aren’t the educated people from st.petetersburg or Moscow.
Long story short, these are your redneck, hillbilly ass mother fuckers who according to my Russian friend from Vladivostok claims barely have an elementary school degree. These guys are robbing old ass tube tvs like its a fashion statement.
1 Like
It’s a town in California.
Now I feel a story coming on, I guess the way normal people feel a dump coming on.
Back in 1972, when I was with Uncle Sam’s Misguided Children, I was on this boat on the sea, and there was this African-American Sergeant in charge of me and a bunch of other people. This man was a Vietnam combat infantry veteran,* and an up-front sort of person, and I admired him a lot. (Originally he was my platoon sergeant, but he got bumped down to being my section leader when a Sergeant who was senior to him joined our company). One day, this Sergeant said something to a young African-American man of lesser rank, something that was well within the scope of the Sergeant’s duties and rights, i. e., that he had an official right to say. But it didn’t sit well with the young man, and the young man said, “You know, some people around here like to hide behind their stripes.” To this statement the Sergeant smiled and calmly replied, “Oh, I’ll take these stripes off if you like. Back home in Compton, fightin’ was my bag.”
And that young fellow had nothing to say after that.
I was only eighteen, and not knowledgeable about these kinds of things, but because of the effect that that name had had on that young man (plus the offer of removing the stripes), I remember thinking, “Damn, that Compton must be a badass place.”
*I didn’t go to Vietnam, and I’ve never been in combat.
6 Likes
War crimes trials for thee but not for me . . .
The Biden administration is vigorously debating how much the United States can or should assist an investigation into Russian atrocities in Ukraine by the International Criminal Court in The Hague, according to officials familiar with internal deliberations. . . .
But laws from 1999 and 2002, enacted by lawmakers wary that the court might investigate Americans, limit the government’s ability to provide support. And the United States has long objected to any exercise of jurisdiction by the court over citizens of countries that are not part of the treaty that created it — like the United States, but also Russia.
The memo also analyzes a 2002 law, the American Servicemembers Protection Act. It bars giving the court other kinds of support — like sharing intelligence, training its staff or lending it personnel. The memo concludes that the United States cannot offer general institutional support, but can provide such help for “particular cases.”
Unlike the funding ban, the 2002 law permits “rendering assistance to international efforts to bring to justice” a list of offenders from that era, like Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden, along with any other foreign citizens who are accused of genocide, war crimes or crimes against humanity.
Pentagon officials, however, are said to be balking. They contended that moving to a case-by-case approach would be shortsighted because it would make it harder for the United States to argue against court investigations into potential war crimes by American forces, officials said. . . .
War crimes were committed in the past that should be tried.
That’s not the plan though. ‘What about war crimes trials for our war criminals too?’ would be whataboutism.
Not meaning to get into this, but yeah, “good” in the first quote was referring to the harvest. “Good” in your quote refers to people.
I know what it meant after I read it a few times . But there are two interpretations there as Mike explained, not my fault if folks don’t use commas.
In the end it didn’t really make much difference to my overall point.
I also couldn’t be bothered getting dragged into this ridiculous argument anymore.
Putin’s pulled a fair few war crimes in the past.
Whatabout war crime trials for all war criminals without excuses?
There are not two interpretations as @MikeN1 suggested. It is clear which clause the word “good” relates to.
1 Like
Mike said there are two interpretations actually.
Go reread what he wrote !
If there were not two interpretations why would it have to be explained?
That’s what Mike wrote and he’s right .
Folks don’t use commas for emphasis what can you do.
Then they throw a hissyfit and throw their toys out of a pram.
Look at the entire original quote. What happens if the word good is removed?