grandfather of all hits? hmmm…maybe no. having had the pleasure of been a fan of whiteyball and a spectator of mcgwire mania i am of the opinion that a well timed hit 'n run is as least as exhilarating as a homer.
furthermore, i think homer run mania is ruining the game. everyone plays for the long ball. fundamentals (larussa: “it isn’t my job to coach.”) are negelected as guys who can’t even hit their weight (245?)swing for the fences. boring. if i wanted such i’d go watch slow pitch softball.
early in the babe’s slugging career his manager apologized for the bambino’s behaviour? was it the drunk carousing? no. babe was trying to hit homeruns. back then, homeruns weren’t the objective and rather a crass display of poor sportsmanship. putting the ball in play was the idea. PUTTING THE BALL IN PLAY. why has baseball failed to gain fans pretty much anywhere outside of america’s sphere of onetime military influence? in no small part because to the non-adepti it is as boring as watching snot roll. for better or worse, the babe did change the way the game was played.
bases loaded. pujols at the plate. does he go for the homer and clear the bases or try to hit one where they ain’t? a homer in no way compares in excitement value to a live ball in play and cardinals(or your team) running all over the place. ain’t even close.
ah the fundamentals required to place a hit. pretty much a lost art in MLB. ever watch cricket? the skills of the batsmen is a joy to behold. they wield their bats like gramps did the carving knife on turkey day: deftly and with poise of intent.
why was the marlins clincher of this day one for the ages? because of the long ball? no. fundamentals were beautifully performed. pudge got his cooperstown plaque forged today. anything after this day is icing on the cake. the beauty is the game played inside the lines.
you can keep the DH if we can just move the fences back out to where they were in the mike schmidt, george foster, andre dawson days: when homers meant something because they weren’t as common as hookers in haikou.
why don’t teams playing in hitter’s heavens win many world series? wrigley is cozy. fenway has its short porch. atlanta, the house that henry built…, cards ain’t won squat sinc ethey brought the fences in. rocks?
if the objective is to win the world series, building a team and a ballpark around the homerun has not proven to be a successful way to go. why? perhaps because in stressing the long ball the essentials to well rounded play are neglected. why are the marlins still leapin and the giants slain? where was the great bonds? fundamentals and put the ball in play will carry the day most everytime. and be fun to watch as well. you can hide lack of fundamentals over the long run 162 game season. in the playoffs everything is chippier and things are tighter. any dullness of the blade is revealed in battle. series over 3-0.
p.s. last year, when SF was in the big series, who made the fielding error that may very well have cost them it all? bigger name than buckner. perhaps the costliest fielding error of all time. could say it cost his team the WS. yet, less than a year on, the event is already forgotten. what homers give in short term ejaculatory spasms of glee they sap away from the tender caress of a well timed stroke, a masterfully placed tweak or a nicely positioned thrust up the gut.
don’t wanna take away from the primal joys of a gang bang homerun but rather merely wish to emphasis the tantric alternative: fundamentals. fundamentals, fundamentals. one offers a passing euphoria no doubt. the other forments a lifelong passion and desire to revist the scenario time and again. we each are free to choose as we see fit.
PS a walk-off single is as much fun as a walk-off homer. a walk-off single ending with a play at the plate is many times more exciting than a walk-off homer.