I didnāt attempt to convince you. Sweden has a better human rights record than any country that incorporates Islamic law into its constitution. Thatās just the way it is.
dude, please explain me about this absolute human right, i believe you will quote all western sources, ignoring the fact that there are different opinion about human rights.
This is a key problem with religious beliefs. Unfortunately, having a thin skin isnāt a reasonable excuse for censorship.
Also, not liking something isnāt really an insult. I donāt particularly like Taiwanese food, but surely that couldnāt offend them. Hmmm, then againā¦
Rights you are naturally born with that canāt be taken away by anyone. If you want to say there are no human rights, fine go ahead and say it. But donāt give me the illogical itās relative bs. Something is true or not, doesnāt matter the source.
That doesnāt make sense. Do they exist or not. If one persons perspective is they donāt and another is they do. They canāt both be right. What are you saying???
Person A says humans have the right to life. Person B says humans donāt have the right to life. They are mutually exclusive, both perspectives canāt be true.
Yes, people have different perspectives about human rights from culture, time period and just the individuals personal beliefs. But it doesnāt change the fact that something is true.
Person A says life is a human right, person B says life is not a human right. They are mutually exclusive perspectives. They canāt both be right. You can have a billion different perspectives, it doesnāt mean shit.
i donāt mean it to change the topic, but any sane Taiwanese, or Muslim in this discussion will feel insulted if you try to bash their food / religion
He doesnāt like Taiwanese food. Iām not offended. Different people have different pallets. Why in the world would I be offended that he personally says he doesnāt enjoy it.