[quote=“ac_dropout”]Or one could have an open relationship. Thus, ending the angst of worrying about cheating.
Because making a value judgement on people who have a natural tendency to cheat is unnatural in a sense.[/quote]
Hey, if it’s an open relationship, then fine. But if it’s not an open relationship, and they are trusting each other not to cheat (which is obviously the norm), then cheating is wrong because it breaks that trust. I guess it’s a matter of not keeping to your promises.
[quote]There are people who are attractive and attracted to many different people.
There are people who are terrible at being alone…
point being the list is ending why good people cheat or find themselves in a cheating situation.[/quote]
It’s perfectly natural to be attracted to others. It’s not as if we lose the ability to be attracted to err, attractive people when we get involved with someone.
But again, the issue is keeping to the tacit or even explicit promise to be faithful.
Not sure about the impact on society, but it’s noteworthy that all societies inevitably evolve written or unwritten rules regarding mating. Jewish culture allowed a man to have as many wives as he wanted until pressure from the Christians forced the rabbis to outlaw polygamy in the early 12th century ad. Shi’a Islam allows for “temporary wives,” complete with marriage contracts that may last no longer than a few days. If a Shi’a Muslim has three permanent wives, he can have as many temporary wives as he wants, as long as they are only one at a time. Tibetans practice polygamy, but in reverse of the usual order: women can have multiple husbands. I studied an indigenous African culture in an anthropology class that actually requires cheating. Men and women can marry and stay paired throughout their lives, but both are required to sleep with the rest of the village. The idea is to conceal the identity of the father, so that the entire village will feel obligated to take care of the children. (I can’t remember the name of the tribe, anyone know which tribe it is?)
But on the personal level, if there is a trust that cheating won’t take place, and that trust is broken, I think that is where the wrong lies.
That certainly isn’t the “only” potential negative impact in a cheating situation.
Agreed. I think a lot of women think men cannot or should not be attracted to other women, which is irrational. But there’s a difference between having an impulse and acting on it.
By the way I recommend a new book called “Lust in Translation”. I read it for a bit at the bookstore. The author travelled to various countries to interview cheaters and those cheated on to get a comparison of how different cultures perceive cheating. Americans apparently take it the most seriously, whereas, according to her research (which she admits is not scientific), other cultures are not so obsessive about it. I remember one example is a Japanese women she interviewed who had an affair on her husband. The author asked her if she felt guilty, and the woman didn’t understand. She repeated it several times, and finally the woman said she was confused. How could you feel guilty when she has not neglected her duties to her family?
I recommend it to you because I suspect you’re the cheating kind (no value judgment made, just my observation from the tone of your posts), and the author certainly takes a dim view of the conservative American perspective.
Cheers,
Gao