My portfolio is not at all the same as it was at the beginning of this thread. Funny enough I was just doing some rebalancing, so I can give you an idea:
62% S and P 500 index
20% individual stocks (GOOG , AMZN mostly, and some Canadian dividend stocks for my taxable account),
8% International ETFs (XEF, Mexico, and S America)
REITs: 6%
Crypto ETFs: 4%
Same as always: ~2x leveraged on margin, about half SPY (which Iâm migrating to VUAA when I do anything â thanks to whoever it was on here that mentioned that), the rest scattered around with a bias toward small-cap value. VIOV has been my best performer for years. The value premium lives!
At some point I need to take the time to figure out whether itâs now more efficient to buy LEAP options than to use IBâs margin. I suspect itâs currently a wash.
A couple years ago I got really into options for a bit, but having no particular market insight I basically just broke even. I might have a play with doing credit spreads to offset margin interest, given that I expect the market to be pretty unexciting. Maybe you feel differently, if youâre going SPXL. Iâve always sort of ignored those funds because my understanding is that volatility decay tends to make them underperform simple margin.
What would yâall do differently with your portfolios with $100k or less vs a few hundred $k - $1M vs $2M vs $5M+?
In my mind:
when you donât have a whole lot (as long as you have a decent income and / or young enough), itâs easy to take higher risks for the big payoffs as youâre not risking much and you can fix mistakes later on.
Similarly, once youâre in the $5M+ VHNI category, it becomes easier to take some bigger risks, with a good cushion if things donât go well.
In the few hundred $k-$1M range, you want good growth without crazy risk, as youâre at the point where youâre starting to see the benefits of compounding.
Above $1M, but before you hit VHNI range, some additional strategies to combine income while still seeking outsized growth seems like the approach.
Once porfolio grows you take less adjusted risk with lower volatility - depends on your age and preferences too
You have to the do homework and know what you own . Understand in what macro einvoroment we are and how your different asset class are currently correlated and how they will be in future.
For example last year 60/40 porfolio was terrible ffor risk /reward. Still terrible.
Most money managers are there for your comission, not for your ROI. Long term is hard to âbeatâ sp500