It can, and apparently does. In your example the second case would be the false negative.
Could also be about the swabbing technique/location, e.g., the amount of virus present at the swabbing site and transferred onto the end of the swab being lower than whatever the detection limit of the test is.
I am surprised that so many of the āaverageā people go on a hike that long. Usually you only get crowds like that when there is a parking lot 5 minutes away.
Really? What do you mean? Iāve read articles suggesting that it can affect the heart, nervous system, etc., but they sounded quite speculative, and itās still fundamentally a respiratory disease, no?
Do you maybe mean just that they didnāt detect the virus in the upper respiratory system?
In any case thereās little point of doing more test when you have a positive PCR test, unless somebody made a mistake in the lab or during the testing. False positive is highly unlikely. False negative in the other hand is not uncommon.
There is a gastrointestinal form, it can attach and reproduce within the instestine I think. Apparently, still under research, it can also attack the nervous system and reduce the production of immune defense. A lot of unknown at this stage.
Huh? Theyāre repeating the test in those confirmed to have COVID-19 because in most places, consecutive negative tests on two or more days is the criteria by which patients are allowed to be discharged from the hospital or exit self-isolation.
The concern is that if patients are āclearedā prematurely but are still contagious, they could continue to spread the virus.