How about the bit where he was allowed to pseudo-quarantine* at home with his family, whereafter his infected son went to school – was that against the rules or in accordance with them?
Obviously he shouldn’t have been allowed to meet with friends etc., but if the first part was in line with the rules at the time, I wonder if this is partially just scapegoating/damage limitation by EVA.
*I mean “Enhanced Super Personal Self-Health Self-Care Self-Management” or whatever it’s called.
Why don’t they do like a month on duty, with breaks at some facility at the airport, then one month off with quarantine? It’s not like they have every plane in the air and need all the pilots.
I didn’t know that. The reason that I concluded this was because how every day experiences happen for me. For example at the bank or a government office or many ordinary offices, people start with “no” and go through their checklist to see if “yes” possible because they don’t want to held responsible for any mistake. I thought this was risk aversion.
What risk taking have you seen?