If some Brazilian president wants to do that, that would be cause for the United States to invade and stop.
I donât know how to interpret this post.
1 Like
Do it literally.
If some Brazilian president threatens the environment and destroy carbon-absorbing trees to dangerous levels for the whole world to dangerous levels, the United States would have to invade and deter him.
Invade what, the Amazon?
2 Likes
Even if the entire Amazon basin disappeared, there would be no danger.
1 Like
They would have to because you would tell them to do it or�
Invade whatever country is destroying the Amazon.
Americans are such warmongers⌠
1 Like
What would be the danger?
Losing the value of undiscovered medicinals?
There would be no carbon or oxygen dangers.
Iâm picturing OO going down there as a mercenary and mowing down loggers. 
Probably theyâll flatten it with daisy cutters and agent orange.
1 Like
More assertions of absence. How do you keep this up?
Guy
1 Like
We have to burn down the rainforest to save the rainforest.
Yes, thatâs the only way to flush them out.
The laser targeting doesnât work when the loggers can just hide behind trees.
1 Like
Really?
This is basic science. The Amazon is basically neutral now.
1 Like
Yes after being savagely cleared for soy production and the cattle industry.
Maybe, as Lula emphasized in his acceptance speech, itâs time for this destruction to stop.
Guy
1 Like
So if it disappeared today, taking all that carbon with it, it would actually be beneficial.
And who the hell are we to live a life of luxury stemming from environmental destruction when people in the basin are just trying to improve their lives and we demand they stay in poverty?
2 Likes