I agree, which is why linking this Argentinian to Glitter or labelling him as far-right was a little cheeky. He has establishment experience as an Economist that is superior to WEF poster boys such as Silk Pony Trudeau.
Oh they could respond better than the first time. The first time they the British got very lucky. If it wasn’t for that one nuclear submarine their troop / ferry would have got sunk. Pretty much one regiment won the Falklands.
I just can’t get past the physical resemblance. It’d be super creepy having Gary Glitter in charge of Argentina.
But yeah, I don’t think he’s “far right” either. Anything to the right of Communism these days gets labelled “far right” - it’s getting completely ridiculous. OTOH he doesn’t strike me as leadership material. Being an ex-banker/financier is a minus in my book, too. Just look at bloody Rishi Sunak to see how that works out.
As for the Trudeau comparison: this is what I was alluding to earlier. When people get saddled with someone like Trudeau who goes completely off into the weeds, it’s a sort of natural human instinct to lurch away from whatever he represents to an extreme degree.
Yes they were good at anti ship operations , their pilots were British and French trained. What they had a problem dealing with was the Harrier in dog fights. The RAF lost almost every Chinook helicopter in just one attack on a modified container ship. The British forces were down to a few days of ammunition. It was in fact a very near defeat which it should have been anyway.