Tell you what, I’m glad I don’t have a CEO with such limited thinking skills. She sounds like a female David Brent.
1 Like
She’s going to be a nightmare. Let’s hope the husband is not screaming for extra curricular activities. 
I pictured this…
1 Like
1 Like
1 Like
Sundance film fest is going on and A24 just premiered a new film. What makes this film so special is that it’s based on a Twitter thread in 2015.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/ew.com/movie-reviews/2020/01/25/zola-sundance-film-festival-review/amp/
How come that’s worthy of news?
Hence my placing it in the WTF thread. 
1 Like
2 Likes
But as he stood to face Judge Haywood Barry, he began expressing his views on why weed should be legalized.
And to amplify his point, he reached into his jacket and slipped out a single marijuana cigarette. He then pulled out a box of matches and, you guessed it, lit it up.
And the rest of the story…whew 
1 Like
Well, you gotta admire him for standing up for his principles 
2 Likes
3 Likes
There’s so much irony in this.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/crime-law/2020/01/30/georgia-state-troopers-fired-cheating/
2 Likes
Why on earth would you even NEED to cheat on something like that? Surely operating a speed-check radar gun isn’t up there in complexity with running, say, air traffic control?
I’m imagining a multiple choice test with questions on it like:
- To switch the device on, one should:
a) Operate the power button
b) Empty a full magazine into it
c) Call a supervisor to assist
2 Likes
That puts perspective on this guy’s story.
But doesn’t the gin taste like … dung? “It’s got an earthy, grassy-type flavor,” said Ansley. “Depending on where we collect the botanicals or which elephants we collect botanicals from, the gin flavor is going to change slightly.”
1 Like
I’m not a gin drinker, but I’ll bet it tastes like shit! Literally and figuratively!
4 Likes
Probably the usual suspect, ie, underachieving males with poor study skills and as a result end up studying criminal justice.
btw here is a version of the test-
http://www.cdacweb.com/Portals/0/TSRP/Radar/Radar%20TESTS.pdf
Which side are you on? I’m on the side of WTF was the school thinking showing a movie at a fundraising function? I mean seriously! Doesn’t everyone know that by owning a DVD of a movie only gives you the rights for personal non-commercial home use? It doesn’t matter if the fundraising is for a righteous cause or not, it’s copyright infringement and then of course peoples’ main argument is the classic “whataboutism”.