Iâm not a bible scholar youâd have to ask Finley , but probably this
Matthew
36 âTeacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?â
37 Jesus replied: ââLove the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.â38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second : âLove your neighbor as yourself.â40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.â
Thatâs unsatisfying. I asked you how you define evil; it doesnât seem that you have a clear definition.
This scripture doesnât cover all kinds of situations that may be more or less âgoodâ. To my way of thinking, that will always be an issue and there is no objective standard.
Well, some may define it based on a few norms of ethical roots. For example causing pain and trauma intentionally. I have no issues defining good and evil without God. Well, without people trying to use God as their excuse to do something. I opt for the biological sense of pain, and use humanistic norms of fair treatment to guide my light.
Plenty of religious people are evil. The rules are just a guideline but people turn them into absolutes and still figure out ways to be evil while conforming to those rules. Itâs how someone serving God will gleefully nail God to a cross.
Thatâs a good start! There are a lot of variables. There are physical realities that play large roles. A normal arm is better than a broken arm, etc.
And the counter side could say: if we break everyoneâs arm, then broken arms are normal humans are great at justifying terrible shit. Easier just to define what one is into directly rather than scape goating on some bullshit (ie. Religion, government, gang, organization, comply etc).
Hitler was evil. Not because the quantity of death, but because the intention to do it. Mrt knife jockeys are evil because of intent to harm/murder. A shitty driver that runs down a family is bad, but not evil. Because they were not intending to cause harm/death. Assuming they werenât intentionally trying to cause pain and death.
Ideas of good and evil change with cultural norms and values. The word of God is absolutely. But of course if youâre an agnostic as you are that doesnât apply. Everyone is on their own spiritual journey but Iâm Christian so believe in that.
Itâs absolutely possible to follow the ten commandments and be evil.
Also the ten commandment wasnât written to all of mankind, it was written to the Israelites (key word being the first one âI am your God, who brought you out of Egyptâ).
Meaning those who donât worship God, the ten commandment wasnât written to them.
I can understand how someone could obey the ten commandments and not be good but I donât understand how they could be evil. Can you give an example?
A certain ruler asked him, âGood teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?â
âWhy do you call me good?â Jesus answered. âNo one is goodâexcept God alone. You know the commandments: âYou shall not commit adultery, you shall not murder, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, honor your father and mother.â
Luke 18:20
Iâm an atheistâI donât believe in âgodsâ. But I donât believe the word of God gives you an objective standard of good, just some rough guidelines. Weâre all in the same boat ultimately
Then itâs not very Christian of you to suggest people who donât believe in what you do are prideful, ergo sinful, and will be punished or killed because of it.
I believe that to be faulty logic, corrupted by emotion most likely.
You say this thread is about possession, but it seems to be about you puffing out your chest about your mystical insights into your own belief system, which to me is just another arbitrary projection.
I get it. I really do. I believe in capitalism and I believe capitalism can save us all, IN THIS LIFE!