The truly-intelligent people I know are all on drugs because they can’t tolerate the banal stupidity of reality, or they’re just cunts.
2 Likes
I am never impressed by people who are overachieving, unless they put their talent, wealth or whatever they have, to good use.
1 Like
Define good use.
I find that those folks who learned, played and escaped the system to live a long life of their own choosing are the smartest.
Whether society rewards them is irrelevant.
There’s achieving and there’s over-achieving. Everyone wants what you describe, but a fair number fall/get consumed before they get there. For one person’s success, how many have had to pay some kind of cost for that?
Not everyone who succeeds is a pimp.
Why are you so determined to defend him? lol.
Helping others who need help
I don’t necessarily disagree with the sentiment, however, shouldn’t all citizens be doing this, not just the successful ones?
This idea that the successful MUST give back to society because their success seems similar to a convict who is asked to pay back their debt to society.
A convict might be applauded for “keeping their nose clean” once released from prison. Why is the same not said or expected of a successful person who, for example, retires early to a quiet, relatively invisible life? 
I certainly would like that.
I don’t necessarily disagree with the sentiment, but those who aren’t successful are often too preoccupied with day to day survival for themselves and their families to have the resources (time or money) to worry about helping others.
There is no MUST but there is a should, because success beyond a certain level is dependent on society, and society is largely built to protect their resources.
Proselytising isn’t giving back to society, it is the opposite, a means of subjugation and keeping the masses dumb and believing in fairytales.
1 Like
He accomplished rather a lot, if you count defrauding gullible Christians.
3 Likes
Please go on. I’m all ears. It’ll take more than a meme quote to make me believe that anyone OWES anything to society, given that it is a human social construct. Socety VALUES different things, intelligence, athleticism, but there is no rule that those who DO benefit from this unequal playing field MUST give back.
1 Like
–or its own survival, at the expense of its citizenry, as war has shown time and time again. Civilization takes on the viral algorithmic quality at times, one programmed for self preservation.
He who? Context, please.
A direct quote from the Bible can hardly be written off as a cute meme. Jesus’ words were explicit. It’s the same idea behind tithing. Islam is even more explicit in its commands for those with money to set aside a certain percentage of their earnings to the community, particularly the poor. Many modern “prosperity gospel” Christians have issue with Jesus’ commandment to give back if you have an abundance, I gather. But it’s perfectly in line with everything else he says in the New Testament.
I don’t much care what some 2000 year old guy said about much, especially if he is remembered as the son of god.
This may mean something to others; me, not so much.modern society is far more a product of Hobbes and Locke than the Old or New Testament.
Old Testament?
1 Like
